Scientific Library

THE EVIDENCE,
IN THE OPEN.

This page documents selected literature informing the N° SYSTEM research approach — what the research shows, at which evidence level, and where it stops. Nothing here is a claim about the finished product.

IN DEVELOPMENT

Evidence hierarchy

THREE LEVELS. NEVER MERGED.

  1. Level 01

    Mechanistic context

    What is biologically plausible?

    Biochemical, cellular and preclinical findings can establish mechanistic plausibility. They do not automatically demonstrate an effect in humans.

  2. Level 02

    Ingredient-level human evidence

    What was observed, at what dose and in which population?

    Human findings are assessed in relation to the specific ingredient form, dose, duration, population and endpoints investigated. Evidence relating to individual ingredients cannot automatically be extrapolated to a combined formulation.

  3. Level 03

    Finished-formulation evidence

    What can be shown for the complete final formulation?

    Product-specific evidence requires the complete final formulation to be evaluated in appropriately designed human studies. The strength of that evidence depends on factors including study design, comparator, sample size, endpoints, duration and reproducibility.

Evidence review

COMPOUND BY COMPOUND.

Each compound in this library is listed with its current evidence level, the interpretation applied to that evidence, its limitations and the primary references behind it.

  1. 01

    Nicotinamide Riboside

    Evidence level 02

    Oral nicotinamide riboside raises blood NAD⁺ metabolites in humans in controlled trials. Functional outcomes across those trials remain inconsistent and population-dependent.

    LimitationsIncreased NAD⁺ availability is a biomarker, not a demonstrated clinical benefit.

  2. 02

    Calcium Alpha-Ketoglutarate

    Evidence level 01

    Alpha-ketoglutarate sits at the junction of energy and amino-acid metabolism. The longevity-relevant data are pre-clinical.

    LimitationsNo controlled human trial supports an ageing-related outcome. Model-organism lifespan data do not transfer to people.

  3. 03

    Ubiquinol (CoQ10)

    Evidence level 02

    Coenzyme Q10 is an established component of mitochondrial electron transfer. Human trials exist, largely in defined clinical populations rather than healthy adults.

    LimitationsFindings in patient cohorts cannot be presented as benefits for healthy users.

  4. 04

    Glycine + N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine

    Evidence level 02

    Supplying both rate-limiting glutathione precursors has been studied in small human trials reporting restored intracellular glutathione and improved oxidative-stress markers in older adults.

    LimitationsTrials are small, open-label or short in duration. Biomarker change is not a clinical endpoint.

  5. 05

    Reduced L-Glutathione · L-Ergothioneine

    Evidence level 02

    Oral glutathione has been shown to raise body stores in a controlled trial. Ergothioneine is a diet-derived compound with a dedicated transporter; human data are largely observational and mechanistic.

    LimitationsAssociations between blood ergothioneine and health outcomes are observational and cannot establish causation.

  6. 06

    Standardised Pomegranate Extract

    Evidence level 02

    Pomegranate ellagitannins are converted by the gut microbiome into urolithins. Human trials of urolithin A report effects on muscle mitochondrial biomarkers; conversion capacity varies between individuals.

    LimitationsExtract and isolated-urolithin data are not interchangeable. Microbiome-dependent conversion limits generalisation.

  7. 07

    Micronutrient cofactors · Taurine

    Evidence level 02

    Magnesium, vitamins D3, K2, B6, B12 and folate (5-MTHF) carry established physiological functions with authorised nutrient claims in the EU. Taurine's ageing-related data are pre-clinical.

    LimitationsAuthorised nutrient-function claims describe normal physiology. They are not anti-ageing claims, and taurine's animal data are not transferable to humans.

Method

HOW WE READ A STUDY.

01

Source selection

Peer-reviewed primary literature, systematic reviews and official regulatory opinions. No press releases, no marketing material, no secondary blog summaries.

02

Context before headline

Every study is read with its dose, duration, population, endpoint and study design. A single positive endpoint does not become a claim.

03

Separation of levels

Mechanistic, human and product-level evidence are recorded separately and never merged into one statement.

04

Recorded limitations

Where evidence is weak, indirect or absent, that is stated on this page rather than omitted.

Formulation philosophy

HOW EVIDENCE BECOMES FORMULATION.

Evidence does not need to be overstated to be useful.

At N° SYSTEM, ingredient selection is not based on a single study, biomarker or mechanistic finding. We evaluate the totality of available evidence — including biological relevance, human data where available, mechanistic coherence, dose context, safety, bioavailability and compatibility within the complete formulation.

Where evidence is preliminary, preclinical or limited, we say so.

Scientific uncertainty is not something to hide. It is something to define.

What we do not claim

THE BOUNDARIES OF EVIDENCE.

  • No clinical trial has been conducted on the finished N°1 formulation. Evidence-level 03 is currently empty by design.
  • Ingredient-level research does not transfer automatically to a combination product, its dosages or its final matrix.
  • No statement on this page is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, or to slow, reverse or measure human ageing.

Food supplements should not be used as a substitute for a varied, balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle.